MMA to attend APC

MMA to attend APC: Liaqat Baloch

Wednesday, January 17, 2007 (10:39 PST)
MMA to attend APC: Liaqat Baloch

ISLAMABAD: MMA central leader Liaqat Baloch has said religious alliance has two opinions on resignation issue. He said this while talking to the journalists at Al-Falah hall here on Tuesday. He held M MA tabled several bills in Senate and National Assembly for the protection of women rights, which were killed in speaker’s chamber. Some were killed by law ministry and some are still pending with standing committees.
He went on to say that not only the ulema have condemned the Women Protection Bill (WPB) but coalition partners of ruling PML-Q are also opposed to it. " We have not talked of boycotting senate session, therefore, our senator will attend it", he told. There is no hope that government will do any good, therefore, MMA will not support it in its evil doings. MMA had decided in its earlier meeting that religious alliance law makers would resign if government made legislation against Quran and Sunnah. Some new aspects, dimensions and points have been presented by JUI-F, Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith and Islami Tehrik-e- Pakistan in this respect. MMA had earlier settled several bitter issues amicably through mutual consultation and it will resolve all problems with consensus in future, he hoped. MMA central organisation has completed two years and central office bearers have to be elected for next two years, he told. The central office bearers have never remained controversial. He indicated that heads of all parties were contacted by Mian Nawaz Sharif in connection with participation in All Parties Conference (APC) being convened by PML-N. MMA will participate in this APC with full force, he added. Opposition parties should launch joint struggle. He claimed general Musharraf is too much disappointed in regard to next general elections. His supporters will have to face unprecedented defeat in upcoming elections.

Mushi's OUT

Musharraf’s term to end in Dec ’08: PPP

Friday, January 19, 2007 (10:41 PST)
Musharraf’s term to end in Dec ’08: PPP

ISLAMABAD, Jan 18: The controversy over re-election of President Gen Pervez Musharraf for the next term took a new turn on Thursday when Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) claimed that the term of President Musharraf would end on December 31, 2008, and not October 15, 2007, as claimed by the government.
PPP spokesman and former senator Farhatullah Khan Babar said in a statement that after the general election held in October 2002 Gen Musharraf got a vote of confidence, on December 31, 2003, from the present assemblies.“As the term of president is for five years, the re-election of the president of Pakistan will occur on December 31, 2008, whereas the term of the new assemblies will begin latest by February 2008, if assemblies are dissolved by their last date in November 2007," he said.

Mr Babar said one assembly could elect a president once, although it could elect another person as president if the office fell vacant through resignation or death.

Sehba covering Musharraf

Sehba covering Musharraf
Friday, September 14, 2007 (02:43 PST)
Sehba covering Musharraf
ISLAMABAD: PML-Q President Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain said on Thursday that Sehba Musharraf would be a covering candidate for her husband President General Pervez Musharraf in the presidential election
He told a private television channel that the PML-Q was ready to consult other parties to remove their reservations on the presidential poll. Shujaat said he had no objections to the return to Pakistan of Kulsoom Nawaz, wife of former PM Nawaz Sharif. online

Imperatives of bright future

Imperatives of bright future

Qazi Hussain Ahmad
Pakistan is trapped in utmost economic and political crisis. It desperately needs sincere, upright and courageous national leadership to steer the country out from prevalent mess. A cursory look on the country’s 58 years of history has proved it beyond doubt that civil and military bureaucracy and elite of Pakistan can not provide such leadership to Pakistan.
Ultimately, we have to resort to masses for bringing such leadership to the forefront and prepare the people for a mass movement. How can the masses be prompted to bring about a change in their destiny? Whether the nation possess the wish to change their fate or not? Answer to these questions lies in a fact that no nation can get to change unless it has wish to do so. Our national poet and great thinker Allama Mohammad Iqbal has termed the disappointment as decline of knowledge and enlightenment.
A political leadership with clear vision of future can only imbibe the hope and end prevalent disenchantment and fear among the masses. Sincere political workers should be cable of mobilizing their spirit in to the lot of masses because people would rally around the sincere leadership only and will enthusiastically take part in the drive. In order to achieve this objective, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan is striving to unite all opposition quarters on one platform and seeking to organize them for massive movement.
As a practical step, all political parties should form small groups of youthful public speakers to make brief speeches aimed at mobilizing the masses to take part in national level drive against the sitting military dictatorship. They should make the workers feel that the drive against the government is bound to succeed and not an iota of failure should be present there.
The success of movement also lies in the fact that the drive remains peaceful and within the confines of law and constitution. This will ensure national facet of the movement and help unite the entire nation on one agenda. The peaceful facet of this movement will plug against the propaganda of oppressive forces aiming at branding the movement as violent move and resort to using violent and unconstitutional means to crush this drive. The floor of parliament will also be helpful in furthering the movement as time may come during the drive when relinquishing the membership of parliament will guarantee the success of movement. Until that time opposition should keep on representing the masses while remaining focused and united by depositing their resignations with the leadership. This will enable the respective opposition leaders to tender them on appropriate time. The Jamaat-e-Islami’s MPs have taken lead in this regard and hopefully other component parties of MMA and Alliance for Restoration of Democracy will follow the suit shortly.
With the announcement of General Pervez Musharraf re-election through the sitting assemblies, the military dictator wishes to add new chapter to his unconstitutional rule. The direct beneficiaries of this unconstitutional arrangement are out to support the humiliating demand of General Musharraf against all the norms of morality and law. All the well-wishers of Pakistan are bound to meet this open challenge. Regretfully, there are people in the ranks of opposition who feel comfortable with the secular and pro-American agenda of sitting rulers but they have temporarily compromised to enjoy partnership in the government for covering up their corruption and saving their skin. Such elements could not be trusted for the success of anti- government drive and opposition should spot them at the earliest.
Self-styled intellectuals and columnists speaking the language of treasury have been entrusted the task of creating doubts among the opposition parties and impeding their unity. Instead of exposing the dangers of autocratic rule in Pakistan these writers are busy in pointing fingers to the role of the MMA, PPPP and the PML (N) and misleading the people about these political parties so that masses get disenchanted with them. These lackeys of King’s party proudly equate democracy with that of dictatorship. People need to guard against them using all available resources.
There is no dearth of self-deceiving people who are pinning hope on the international quarters that they will pressurize sitting rulers to hold free, fair and transparent elections. The experience of local bodies’ election sufficiently denies the idea of free elections by the sitting rulers. People supporting the elections under Musharraf wish to become part of this unconstitutional, undemocratic and immoral set up so that they join hands with the foreign masters of sitting government and adopt the role of anti-people quarters working against the solidarity and sovereignty of the country. Patriot people are bound to expose such opportunists.
Islamabad is following a meek policy, on various fronts, under the US dictates. Foreign, education and fiscal policy dictates are coming from Washington and the Pakistan’s front line role in the American so called war on terror has multiplied the chances of foreign attack in our tribal areas. The imprudent use of military might in tribal and Balochistan areas has endangered the sovereignty of Pakistan. The situation warrants an immediate change of command in the country. The replacement of outgoing army general from the active politics with that of another uniformed leader will not bring about the requsite change in the country.
The real change will occur only when the masses will enthrone their own leadership enabling them to bring about the cherished changes. Likewise, judicature also needs a complete overhaul to ensure speedy justice to the aggrieved party. Revamp of country’s economic system should also be done in such a way that destitute and poor have priority right on the basic needs than luxuries of the rich. Moral education should form an integral part of uniformed education system in the country because this can ensure continuous progress towards glory.
This is high time for the patriotic politicians of Pakistan to come forward and perform their due role in nation building. They should lend a helping hand to make future of their countrymen brighter. We will take the people towards brighter future in the days to come.
The writer is President, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal and Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. He can be reached at: jipmedia@jamaat.org

Ramadhan

فَمَنْ حَآجَّكَ فِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ مَا جَاءكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ فَقُلْ تَعَالَوْاْ نَدْعُ أَبْنَاءنَا وَأَبْنَاءكُمْ وَنِسَاءنَا وَنِسَاءكُمْ وَأَنفُسَنَا وأَنفُسَكُمْ ثُمَّ نَبْتَهِلْ فَنَجْعَل لَّعْنَةُ اللّهِ عَلَى الْكَاذِبِينَ
پھر اگر یہ لوگ عیسیٰ کے بارے میں تم سے جھگڑا کریں اور تم کو حقیقت الحال تو معلوم ہو ہی چلی ہے تو ان سے کہنا کہ آؤ ہم اپنے بیٹوں اور عورتوں کو بلائیں تم اپنے بیٹوں اور عورتوں کو بلاؤ اور ہم خود بھی آئیں اور تم خود بھی آؤ پھر دونوں فریق (خدا سے) دعا والتجا کریں اور جھوٹوں پر خدا کی لعنت بھیجیں

Qazi Hussain Ahmad (Pashto / Urdu: قاضی حسین احمد) is the president of the Pakistani Muslim religious party, the Jamaat-e-Islami. He is also the leader of the Muttahidah Majlis-e-'Amal (Council of United Action) or MMA.
Qazi Hussain Ahmed was born in 1938 at Ziarat Kaka Sahib in the district of Nowshera, North-West Frontier Province (NWFP). His father Qazi Muhammad Abdul Rab, a farmer by profession, was also well versed in Islamic religious sciences.
After having completed his early education at home, Qazi Hussain Ahmed was admitted to Islamia College, Peshawar, and earned his Masters of Science (M.Sc.) degree in Geography from the University of Peshawar. He served as lecturer for three years, teaching at the graduate level in Swat, NWFP. Inclined more towards business, he was not very enthusiastice to continue his teaching profession; instead he started his own business 34 Sueqarno Chowk Peshawar The business is now administrated by his Son Dr.Anas Farhan Qazi. His affiliation with the Islamic Movement started in his school days when he joined [Islami Jamiat-e-Talaba] an islamic students organization very well known for promoting peace activities and islamic values in educational institutions], Pakistan. He became member of Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan in 1978, and was elected the Ameer of the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan in 1987. He continues to serve in that capacity, getting re-elected twice.
Despite bashing PML(N) and PPP for promoting family members in politics and transforming political parties into a family business based on chronieism rather than democracy, he got his daughter, Mrs.Samia Raheel Qazi, who is an active member of jamaat's women wing ,elected as member of the national assembly in 2002. She was a staunch opponent of the women rights bill proposed by Musharraf government. The bill was aimed to protect the rights of rape victims.
Though being an arch opponent of USA, and preaching poor pople to send their sons to madrassas and Jihad, his Son Asif Luqman Qazi Holds a Masters Degree From Boston University USA. He came back to Pakistan in 1994 after completing his studies He is now Deputy Ameer Jamaat-e-Islami Nowshehra and Deputy Director Foreign Relations Jamaat-e-Islami pakistan(another example of serving family interests). His other Daughter Khowla Ahmed Qazi is a well educated Woman has done LLB Shariah from IIUI, and MA English From Wise College Lahore and also involved on a senior level in Jamaat politics strengthening the house of Qazis.
Qazi Hussain Ahmed was first elected as member of the Senate of Pakistan in 1986 for a term of six years. He was re-elected as such in March 1992, but he resigned in 1996 as a protest against the corrupt political system.
Mr. Ahmed has widely travelled abroad to represent the Jamaat at the international forums, leading goodwill missions as well as in his personal capacity to mediate on issues concerning the Muslim Ummah. The Jamaat strongly supported military dictator Zia ul Haq in his "Islamization" of Pakistan, particularly the introduction of the Hudood Ordinances, under which thousands of Pakistani women, some alleged to be rape victims, have been jailed for adultery.
Within the country, Qazi Ahmed remains in the movement undertaking the campaign of fundamentalism, mobilization of militias and party organization. His patronage of organizations like Pasban and subsequently the formation of Shabab-e-Milli, notorius for their violent means and enforcing talibanization of the society, is very well known.
Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA) President Qazi Hussain Ahmed has said that holding of both the offices of president and army chief by Gen Pervez Musharraf is unlawful and immoral,the MMA leader said Gen Musharraf should have put off his uniform after December 31, 2004, as he had pledged. But he backed out and this made his position unlawful, he added. While in public having made repeated statements against Musharraf, he played a pivotal role in getting the 17th amendment passed by the parliament which legitimized the General's rule and paved way for army to stay in power. hawever not to forget that Qazi and his party were key supporters of Gen. Zia another military dictator in 80's.
However in public he put forward several demands, which were resignation of Gen Musharraf as president, an interim government after consensus, restoration of constitution in its original form as that prior to October 12, 1999, and an independent election commission, revamping women rights bill, passing of Hisba bill by senate and finally pulling out of amrican war of terrorism, since Qazi is well known for his struggle against evil forces.

On July 23, 2007, he resigned for his National Assembly seat saying that the parliament was being neglected and whims of an individual.

Remotely Controlling Pakistani Politics By Dr. Mahjabeen IslamWashington, DC: There are three types of Pakistani-Americans, I’ve decided. The first is the set that would have you believe that they were entirely European, and wish not the faintest link with Pakistan and what happens there is not the smallest blip in their horizon. Then there is the set that is interested in the future of America as well as what course politics in Pakistan takes. The third category, as hapless as the first is here only in body; for the spirit, mind, heart and soul it resides in Pakistan. APPNA members at Capitol HillIt is the last two categories perhaps that make up the group that organized a forum to examine women’s issues in South Asia, and some of them are part of APSA, The Action Group of Physicians of South Asia who organized a meeting of Pakistani politicians. Both these events were held at the summer meeting of APPNA, Association of Pakistani Physicians of North America, in Washington, D.C. in June this year.The speakers for the women’s issues forum were Hina Jilani a lawyer and secretary of a human rights organization in Pakistan and Raheel Kazi an MP elected on the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal, MMA ticket in Pakistan. At the inception a short film about the Hudood Ordinance and how it has wreaked havoc in peoples’ lives was shown. Ms. Kazi was connected to the forum by telephone from Pakistan for she could not attend as the National Assembly was in session. Both speakers were given an opportunity to make a brief presentation of their points of view and right off the bat Ms. Kazi complained that the “other side” was always given more time and that she had sent a Power Point presentation which should have been shown and there was another film that gave their point of view and that should have been screened as well.Ms. Kazi felt that everything in Pakistan was being wrongfully ascribed to the Hudood Ordinance and that just removing one law would not take care of the problem. She felt that it was important that in relation to article 227 all laws would be made Islamic and that we all should be glad that this was happening instead of trying to repeal the Hudood Ordinance for it serves as a deterrent. Also that the media and government organizations ought to play a role in underscoring the above sentiment.Hina Jilani thanked the organizers and said that the fact that this forum was organized went to prove that people care. She emphasized that those subjected to the Hudood Ordinace were real people and not fictitious characters, and they had not suffered Divine law but a law formulated by one who now heads the National Reconstruction Bureau. At the time that the law was formulated, dissenters were beaten up, labeled as heretics and jailed. She said that there was a tendency to mislead by saying that the law is being misapplied when in actuality there is a problem with the application of the law. The basic argument in Pakistan is on whether the law should be amended or repealed. The fact though is that the law is so deeply flawed that there is no amending it. Her organization has examined all 22 sections of the law, and 18 of them are badly drafted or there is a procedural lacuna. Most of the victims of the law are women and non-Muslim minorities but men suffer as well. A significant issue with the law is that a woman’s capacity as a full witness is not accepted and children are punished as though they are adults. The definition of an adult is a woman who has attained puberty, or else age 16 and a man who has attained puberty or else age 18. The huge inherent contradiction is that a female child can be punished as an adult, but even when she is 16 or over, her evidence cannot be taken. Azeem Miyan of Geo TV accused Raheel Kazi of protecting Zia-ul-Haq and his law and not protecting Islamic law, but like with all other questions/accusations Ms. Kazi simply said that there was nothing wrong with the law. Period. When asked whether a woman can be a witness, Kazi vehemently stated that she could for Khadija in her time did give evidence and a woman was a witness against the Caliph of her time, Usman. Hina Jilani said simply that under the Hudood Ordinance the way it is currently, a woman cannot give evidence equal to a man. A doctor in the audience asked why Benazir was not able to do away with the law to which Ms. Jilani replied that Benazir inherited Zia’s “chadar and chardeewari” prescription for women and she tried to set up committees to do away with the law but was unsuccessful.During the vibrant discussion, there was agreement that feudalism and the fact that right after partition India did away with it and Pakistan did not had a lot to do with the suppression of women. Another questioner asked Ms. Kazi how this law was justifiable when Islam was based on justice and compassion. Ms. Kazi remained a stalwart of the Nazi propagandist Goebbels’ premise that if you repeat something often enough it becomes the truth and stolidly restated that there was nothing wrong with the law. I asked Ms. Kazi if being a woman she felt any compassion for the hundreds of women that languish in prison due to this heinous law deliver and raise children in jail, Ms. Kazi obtusely said that women under Islamic law should not go to jail at all! Huh?In true medical style a physician asked what could be done and Ms. Jilani prognosticated dimly: there is no question of getting consensus to repeal the law, but we should be able to put in a stitch or two to amend it. The discussion was lively but it was plain that pushed by myopic misdirected types like Ms. Kazi, the Hudood Ordinance would outlive all in that room. APSA had gotten quite a mix of Pakistani politicians together to discuss democracy in Pakistan and sure enough the discussion was lively, leaving one wishing that there had been more time to continue it. Aqil Shah is pursuing a doctorate in political science at Columbia University. He attributed the weakness of Pakistani politics to feudalism and military dominance. He stated that since 1977 no government had completed its term and the military cannot run Pakistan and it does not allow anyone to run it either. “The military government has a hammer but everything is not a nail” was greeted with loud applause. Pakistan is a military façade and they wish to subordinate the judiciary and the entire state. He said that religious parties were important in Pakistan but the MMA was appropriately called the “mullah military alliance”, and the military had always groomed fringe alliances. The military had ensured that the MMA won in the election and it turns around and tells the US that it is a bulwark against extremism, which it is not. Aqil Shah was full of catchy phrases, another one was that “there is freedom of expression but is there freedom after expression?” and “the Pakistan military is the main part of the problem and it pretends to be the solution” and ominously that festering political grievance can lead to agitation. In greeting Senator Tariq Azam Khan of PML-Q, the audience proved that despite high education, grievances could transform people into veritable hooligans. Boos from the audience tried to silence the senator but he was courageous and dignified, leaving me embarrassed at the puerile behavior of my colleagues. “We are here to have a discussion,” he said while the organizers exhorted the hecklers to practice the parliamentary behavior that is vital to the democracy that they wished practiced. Senator Tariq analogized democracy to medical parlance and the condition of the patient. The condition of Pakistan was important, he said, and whilst the US was such a great proponent of democracy it did not insist on its institution when it liberated Kuwait, but as far as Pakistan goes the US continually uses it as a stick.Senator Tariq Azam Khan spoke about the 1977 election whence the cab driver that had driven him to the polls did not know who he had voted for, just that it was the lion symbol. The senator felt that it was important to understand which part of the world one was dealing with, and what type of democracy one wanted, and that in Pakistan the army had been involved in every decision. People had traditionally wanted the “Pindi route” than the democracy route, in reference to wanting the army rather than civilian rule. Democracy had given Pakistan Mr. 10% and billions had been looted he said in reference to Benazir’s husband Asif Ali Zardari’s extracting a 10% commission from all and sundry during her heyday. Army rule, he said, had brought “Mr. Clean”. This ignited another round of unruliness in the audience and I had to control myself for I really wanted to join them.Ahsan Iqbal of PML-N spoke about the knowledge revolution and that without the participation of the people there could not be any advancement of note. The biggest crisis, he said, was the crisis of power and when there was complete loss of self-esteem there was a depression and the army has convinced the people that everything was ruined and that it had now come to save Pakistan. Pakistanis are not any less honest nor any more corrupt than any other nation and even if an illiterate taxi driver does not know whom he has voted for he cannot be denied the right to self-governance. He said that democracy had failed in Pakistan because the generals carve out a role for themselves and he had told the American government that if democracy could be given to Iraq, what was Pakistan’s fault that the same yardstick was not used. Aitazaz Ahsan of the PPP traced the rise of the military to power in 1958 with its consummation when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan at which time the mullah-military alliance became stronger still. In what is now a symbiotic relationship the generals are able to tell the US that if they (the generals) are not there the mullahs will come in and they tell the mullahs that if they (the generals) are not there the US will come in. He said that the army and the mullahs threaten vulnerable society and that he had a pessimistic view about democracy coming in Pakistan.The question and answer session of the Hudood Ordinance meeting paled in comparison to the almost confrontational tone of this one. Nayyer Zaidi of Jang/Geo wanted to know the prognosis of Pakistan and when the General would take off his uniform. The questions were sadly rhetorical. He did ask Ahsan Iqbal why he had felt that joining the party of a man that had been groomed by the generals would be a good one to join, Iqbal answered that he had found Nawaz Sharif’s economic plan attractive and had hoped he would see the importance of democracy.Amy Goodman of Free Speech TV/Democracy Now asked a very pertinent question: would Musharraf be there without US support and why was the US supporting a general in uniform? Aqil Shah explained the reasoning by quoting Roosevelt: “He might be an SOB but he is our SOB”. An uncomfortable question raised was that Nawaz Sharif froze Pakistani money but diverted his own money to foreign accounts and created his own town of Raiwind, and similarly Benazir looted the exchequer. Ahsan Iqbal amid much protest by the audience said that all banking transactions were documented and that none of what was alleged took place. Benazir defender, Aitazaz Ahsan said that on the dismissal of the government in August 1990, Asif Ali Zardari was taken before a set of hand -picked judges and there was a lot of bribing. He was acquitted of all charges between 1990 and 1993 and that he was innocent until proven guilty. On the connection of feudalism and democracy, Aitazaz Ahsan said that the biggest feudal lord in the country was the army with a multitude of organizations it holds such as the Fauji Foundation and extensive property as well. Senator Tariq said that Nawaz Sharif was convicted in the 2000 steel mill case, to which Aqil Shah promptly dispensed another one liner: we need protection by the military as much as we need protection from the military. Ahsan Iqbal demanded the right to self-governance and observed that Musharraf had cleansed the two parties that were under his wing, and he also wondered where Musharraf’s “enlightened moderation” was when Shahbaz Sharif was being thrown out. There was a consensus that the problem in Pakistan was that institutions were weak and people were strong and that in India institutions were strong. In answer to a volley of questions Senator Tariq stated that the army does not have a role in ruling the nation but that it had been invited to do so due to the misdeeds of the political masters. He exhorted political parties to have elections within their parties as well. Aqil Shah said that in the absence of civilian oversight the army had gone into many misadventures. Amid much applause Aitazaz Ahsan traced the “yes sir” phenomenon as causing some of the current misadventures. When a recruit joins Kakul he is ragged till he says “yes sir” to all superiors, and then the Major says “yes sir” to all of his and so on till the Commander-in-Chief at 3 o’clock in the morning says “yes sir” to Colin Powell when he demands to know whether Pakistan was with the US in the fight against terrorism or not. About a year and a half ago I had written, “Hudood Ordinance Has Reached Its Hudd” for the Pakistan Link and emailed the article to a high-up in the Pakistan government. Musharraf apparently read the article but the time was not right then for him to challenge the mullahs and recommend repeal of the Hudood Ordinance. He seems to think that the time now is ripe, though with as polarized as the politics in Pakistan has become and Musharraf’s own life hangs in the balance, it is highly doubtful that anything will come of it. Clashing with the APSA meeting was a luncheon by an organization that is primarily concerned with American politics and looks upon this kind of meeting with Pakistani politicians as a waste as there is no focus on the futures of our children in America. As I was able to influence the review of the Hudood Ordinance by my article last year, physicians especially since they are the upper echelon of earning power in the US, have a definite ability to affect politics in Pakistan. It is well known that in the Third World, only he who America wants will rule, so in response to the above criticism, it was my turn to be glib: these meetings are important for just a shuttle ride away was the Capitol and it is not exaggeration to say that the US Capitol holds the key to who rules Pakistan. And the two categories of Pakistani-Americans believe that they can at least try to remotely control politics in Pakistan: perseverance for the return of democracy may well command success. One day.inshAllah.

Adaey Faraz Ka Ehsas

Dekho,
Namaz woh cheez hey jo har din mey 5 waqat tumharay emaan ko mazbut karti rehti hey.Ye bar bar tum ko us bari ebaadat key liyay tayyar karati hey jo sari zindagi Allah key huzur karni hey.Ye in tamam aqeedo ko taza karti hey.Jin pe tumharay nafas ki pakeezgi,rooh ki taraki,ikhlas ki dosti aur amal ki islaf moquf hey.....Namaz mein jo cheezein khamoshi key sath parhi jati hein aghar tum unko na parho ya un ki jaga kutch aur parho to tumhein kis ka khauf hey .... ?
Jaha koi daikhne wala nehi hota waha konsi cheez tumhein namaz key liyay uthati hey?Woh yeh he etiqaad to hey keh Khuda tum ko daikh raha hey.Namaz key wakat zaroori se zaroori kaam churwa kr kaun se cheez tumhein namaz ke taraf ley jati hey?Woh yeh he tou ehsas hey ke namaz Khuda ney faraz ki hey.
From the book
Deniyat by Syed Abu Al Alaa Maududi Rh.

Tarbiyat ...

Zindagi Kutch Aur Shaye Hey Elm Hey Kutch Aur Shaye
Zindagi Soze Jigar Elm Hey Soze Dimagh

Elm Mey Dolat Bhi Hey Qudrat Bhi Hey Lizzat Bhi Hey
Ek Mushkil Hey Keh Hath Ata Nehi Apna Suragh

Ehle Danish Aam Hein Kam Yad Hein Ehle Nazar
Kiya Ta'jud Hey Keh Khali Reh Gya Tera Ayakh

Shamm'e Maktab Key Tareeko Se Kushada Dil Kaha
Kis Tarha Kabriyat Se Roshan Ho Bijli Ka Charagh

Dr.Mohammad Allama Iqbal

Challenges of Present

Asslamaliekum warehmatullahi wabarakatuhu,
Knowing the condition of Pakistan,that obligated on us to protect ourselves from enemy and learn to protect our great-great country.Many great incidents have fallen upon us as Jamya Hafsa, Masjid Ameer Hamza,The attack of generals in politics, so to save ourselves from all these incidents we should do something! Its not only ' we should do' we have to and let's start it from the next coming moment before the arrival of death angel.
Any mistake I have made?Please do not hesitate to assure me.
Prayers,
The Tigress of Qazi Hussain Ahme !!!

Asslamlaiekum warehmatullah,
What's up?Well this is going to be like a serious page.You are most welcome to disscuss on any current or previous/past issue,but please do not forget you should be a person as knowing what you are disscussing with all the informations.Be sure that if you are trying to defend someone you have all the clue and informations and incase of fighting against someone you should have proper arguments.
Regards,
Maria Choudry.